Disposed
Prabha v. Wajid & Ors.
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/76/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Contempt petition wherein petitioner disclaimed interest in pursuing the petition. Court disposed of the matter as not pressed while granting liberty to file afresh.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to file the petition afresh in case need so arises granted.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~146
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CONT.CAS(C) 76/2025
¶4
PRABHA .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: Mr. Hasnain Ali, Advocate. versus WAJID & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Badar Mahmood, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Ammar Ahmad, Advocate. Mr. Shekhar Dasi, Mr. Md. Talha, Mr. Ayush Dassi, Advcoates for intervener/Taufeeque.
¶6
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
¶7
O R D E R % 21.01.2025
¶8
- Learned counsel for respondent No.2/MCD appears on advance notice and submits that the partial demolition was carried out earlier and now further action is scheduled for 28.02.2025.
¶9
- Mr. Shekhar Dasi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Taufeeque submits that the property in question is owned and occupied by said Mr. Taufeeque and he has already filed an appeal before Appellate Tribunal MCD, which is likely to be taken up for consideration tomorrow itself. He also submits that, as on date, no construction is going on at the property in question.
¶10
- In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is, at the moment, not interested in pursuing with the present contempt petition. He, however, seeks liberty to file the
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Prabha
- respondent
Wajid & Ors.
Coram
AI extract
Manoj Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court