Disposed

Shahabuddin v. Naveen Aggarwal & Ors.

Delhi HC21 Jan 2025CONT.CAS(C)/75/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition regarding alleged unauthorised construction was not pressed by the petitioner after respondents stated partial demolition and sealing had been carried out. The court disposed of the contempt petition as not pressed with liberty to file afresh if no requisite action followed, and directed respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to keep the petitioner informed of proposed action.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of as not pressed with liberty to file afresh; respondents to keep petitioner updated on action

Shahabuddin Vs Naveen Aggarwal & Ors. — Municipal and Town Planning | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~145

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 75/2025 & CM APPL. 3581/2025

¶4

SHAHABUDDIN .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Yash Narayan Trivedi with Mr.Anubhav Dubey, Mr. Sachidanand Chaudhary, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

NAVEEN AGGARWAL & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Sakshi Popli, Standing Counsel for MCD/respondent Nos.1 and 2 with Mr. Avinash Kasawatiya, JE, Central Zone. Mr. Manish Kumar, SPC for respondent Nos.3 and 4

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 21.01.2025

¶11

Learned counsel for respondents appears on advance notice and submits that earlier partial demolition had taken place by puncturing the roof of the top floor. She also submits that partial sealing of the fourth floor has also been done and as per the instructions, some action related to demolition, etc. is slated for today also. She further submits that the photographs placed on record from the side of the petitioner are not the recent one.

¶12

After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the above said statement made by learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2, the petitioner, at the

¶13

CONT.CAS(C) 75/2025

¶14

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2025 at 11:56:04

¶17

moment, is not interested in pursuing with his contempt petition. He, however, submits that in case there is no requisite action, he may be permitted to file contempt petition afresh.

¶18

In view of the above, the present contempt petition is disposed of as not pressed. Liberty, as prayed, is granted. 4. However, respondent Nos.1 and 2 shall keep the petitioner updated about the proposed action and would also keep him in loop, solely because of the fact that the action against the alleged unauthorised construction was directed to be taken on his petition only.

¶19

MANOJ JAIN, J

¶20

JANUARY 21, 2025 st

¶21

CONT.CAS(C) 75/2025

¶22

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/01/2025 at 11:56:04

Shahabuddin v. Naveen Aggarwal & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shahabuddin v. Naveen Aggarwal & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mayank Gaur and Anr. Vs Maharaj Malik & Ors.

Vikash Kumar Yadav Vs Shri Ajay Kumar Bhalla and Ors.

Ravinder Kumar Vs Deputy Commissioner

Shubham Jha Vs Mr Nand Kishore Garg and Ors.

Gaurav Chugh Vs Deepti Taneja

Smt Vibha Kapur Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Pooja Vs Manoj Kumar

Varun Arora Vs Shruti Arora

Mayank Gaur and Anr. Vs Maharaj Malik & Ors.

Karan Mehar Vs Special Task Force /Dda& Ors.

Vikash Kumar Yadav Vs Shri Ajay Kumar Bhalla and Ors.

Vineet Gupta Vs Reserve Bank of India & Ors.

M/S Northern India Masonic Charitable Society Vs Delhi Development Authority and Anr.

Prabha Vs Wajid & Ors.