Contempt petition withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel citing defects in the petition; the court dismissed it as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition in accordance with law.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
RAMESH CHAND .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Mr. Sandeep Khatri, Ms. Kirti Bhardwaj, Ms. Nehmat Sethi, Mr. A. Ali, Ms. Shivani Negi, Advocates.
versus
NEMBATI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Appearance not given.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 10.01.2025
Mr. M.A. Niyazi, learned counsel for the contempt petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this contempt petition in view of certain defects in the petition. He seeks liberty to file a fresh petition in accordance with law.
The petition, alongwith the pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
JANUARY 10, 2025 ‘Bhupi’/AL/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 13:00:54
RAMESH CHAND
NEMBATI
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
