In a contempt petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, the petitioner sought punishment for non-adherence to earlier orders. The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition as not pressed because the respondents had complied with the directives by renewing bank guarantees and submitting fixed deposit receipts before the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
AJAY KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Mr. H.L.Narula, Ms. Rinku Narula, Ms. Poonam Nagpal, Mr. Annugrah E. and Mr. Kanishk Taneja, Advocates.
versus
LTC COMMERCIAL COMPANY PVT LTD & ORS......Respondents Through: Ms. Sangeeta S. and Mr. Daksh Jain, Advocates. CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R % 16.09.2025
“a) Allow the present Petition, passing contempt orders qua Respondent under Section 11 section 2 and section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for wilful and contumacious disobedience of this Hon’ble Court's order dated 27/01/2017, No. 15362/2016 in O.M.P.(I) (Comm.) 306/2016, failing to file and keeping the Bank Guarantee alive/renewed during the pendency of OMP (Comm) 302 of 2016, 305 of 2016 and OMP (Comm) 308 of 2016
b) Pass orders in form of highest punishment and penalty qua Respondents, having failed to adhere to the directions of this Hon'ble Court's order dated 27/01/2017, IA No. 15362/2016 in O.M.P.(I) (Comm,) 356/2016;
c) Pass orders in form of directing the respondents to fulfil the undertaking given to this Hon'ble Court by filing the bank guarantee of differential amount in favour of petitioner as on date for Rs. 93,87,351;
d) Pass any such order directions qua Respondents, and in favour of
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2025 at 12:04:53
Petitioner, in view of the facts and circumstances of the case.”
AMIT SHARMA, J
SEPTEMBER 16, 2025 /sn
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2025 at 12:04:53
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay Kumar
LTC Commercial Company Pvt Ltd
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
