Dismissed
Arjun Kansal v. Ajit Singh Bagga
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/398/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Contempt case dismissed in default as petitioner repeatedly failed to appear when called, including on multiple prior dates.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~18
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CONT.CAS(C) 398/2019
¶4
ARJUN KANSAL .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: None
¶6
versus
¶7
AJIT SINGH BAGGA .....Respondent Through: None
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
¶9
- Though the matter was called twice, there was/ is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on either of the occasions. In fact, there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on 09.07.2025 and 14.10.2024 as well. However, though presence on behalf of the petitioner has been marked on 10.02.2025, albeit with no details therein.
¶10
- In view thereof, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing with the present matter. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
¶11
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Arjun Kansal
- respondent
Ajit Singh Bagga
Coram
AI extract
Saurabh Banerjee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court