A landlord-tenant revision was disposed of after counsel stated that vacant, peaceful and physical possession of the premises had been handed over to the respondent per the Executing Court's order, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
SHAHEEN PARVEEN @ SHEHNAZ PARVEEN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishant Singh, Adv. (through VC)
RAHIMUDDIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Saad Sharif, Adv. (through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 04.11.2025
SAURABH BANERJEE, J.
NOVEMBER 04, 2025/ bh
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/11/2025 at 12:11:10
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition survives after vacant and peaceful possession of the premises has been handed over to the respondent pursuant to the Executing Court's order.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
N.C. Daga vs. Inder Mohan Singh RanaRelied on¶2
[2003(1) SCC 453] · Who else cites this
Vinod Kumar Verma vs. Manmohan Verma & Anr.Relied on¶2
[Civil Appeal Nos.5220-5221 of 2008, order dated 19.08.2008]
Shaheen Parveen @ Shehnaz Parveen
Rahimuddin
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
