Petitioner sought withdrawal of a contempt petition, stating that the respondent had complied with the terms of the settlement agreement and all dues were received. The court disposed of the petition as not pressed.
Permission to withdraw; petition disposed of as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~68
Through: Mr. Shivam Kumar and Ms. Jigyasa Parganiah, Advocates.
versus
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 19.02.2025
MANOJ JAIN, J
FEBRUARY 19, 2025 st
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:21:09
Mr Ramesh Kumar
Mr Shailendra Kumar
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
