Petitioner sought withdrawal of a contempt petition; the counsel stated on instructions that the petition would be withdrawn, and the court dismissed it as withdrawn, disposing of the pending application as infructuous.
None granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn and pending application disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
S C WADHWA AND SONS HUF .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ujjwal Malhotra, Adv. along with Mr. Dhruv Wadhwa, Adv.
versus
GTL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankit Kumar, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 15.07.2025
ANISH DAYAL, J
JULY 15, 2025/RK
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/07/2025 at 11:46:48
S C Wadhwa and Sons HUF
GTL Infrastructure Ltd.
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
