Contempt petition by a coach seeking a special cash award; compliance affidavit filed, cheque of Rs.2,36,000 already received, and petitioner sought to withdraw with liberty to challenge the eligibility decision.
Application for revival allowed; contempt petition disposed of as not pressed with liberty to challenge the award decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
VIKRAM KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pramod Tripathi, Advocate (through V.C.)
versus
UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vineet Dhanda, CGSC for UOI with Ms. Haridas Medha, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 13.01.2025
CM APPL. 43207/2024 (filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking revival of the petition)
For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed.
CONT.CAS(C) 17/2024
CONT.CAS(C) 17/2024
1
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:46:51
apprised that a cheque of Rs.2,36,000/- has already been sent to the petitioner in terms of such decision.
MANOJ JAIN, J
JANUARY 13, 2025 st
CONT.CAS(C) 17/2024
2
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 01:46:51
Vikram Kumar
Union of India
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
