Contempt petition filed by petitioner for non-compliance with a prior order. No party appeared in support of the petitioner; respondent side also absent. Court dismissed the petition in default for non-prosecution.
Petition dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
CHARLTON JOSEPH .....Petitioner
versus
SH. ANSHUL SIROHI, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & ORS. .....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R
“In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, it is, therefore, most respectfully prayed this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to initiate the Contempt Proceedings against the Contemnor for noncompliance of order dated 18.05.2023 passed in W.P No.5637/2023 titled as Charlton Joseph Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors. in the interest of justice.”
hearing as well, i.e. , 22.07.2025.
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:10:46
AMIT SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 19, 2025 /sn/db
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:10:46
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Charlton Joseph
Sh. Anshul Sirohi
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
