Contempt petition regarding a street vendor's seized articles and vending rights. Police confirmed the articles were returned to the petitioner. The court noted the petitioner must vend only per the Certificate of Vending terms and that a hand-cart vendor is not a stationary vendor. Petition disposed of with no further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
MOHD ISHTIYAK ALAM .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Aditya, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. Kailash Kr. Jha, Ms. Anjani Kumar Mishra Advs.
versus
SH. SANJAY ARORA AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rishabh Sahu, SPC with Mr. Sameer Sharma and Ms. Swati Saxena Adv.
Mr. Vikas Garg, Advocate along with Mr. Sagar Aggarwal and Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocates for intervenor. SI Sandeep PS: Malviya Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 17.03.2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2025 at 12:31:45
II , who seeks to intervene in the matter, that the vendor is violating the conditions of CoV.
ANISH DAYAL, J
MARCH 17, 2025/RK/na
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2025 at 12:31:45
Mohd Ishtiyak Alam
Sh. Sanjay Arora
Triveni Shopkeepers Welfare Association, Seikh Sarai Transport Authority
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
