Ct/Gd Parmendra Kumar v. Dr Sujoy Lal Thaosen and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court contempt jurisdiction; batch of ten CONT.CAS(C) petitions of 2023 (Nos. 1004, 1005, 1007, 1010, 1014, 1016, 1086, 1087, 1088, 1183) against Dr Sujoy Lal Thaosen and Ors, with Union of India counsel appearing for respondents; compliance with earlier Court directions on service benefits under the old pension scheme reported by the Official concerned; petitioners absent; contempt petitions dismissed as satisfied and pending applications disposed; coram Dharmesh Sharma, J.; decided 12.03.2025; no statute or precedent cited.
What did the court decide?
In view of the statement made by learned counsels for the respondents, as well as the Official concerned, that the Court's directions have been complied with and the petitioners are being given their service benefits as per the old pension scheme, the present contempt petitions are dismissed as satisfied.