Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an earlier writ order; respondents filed compliance, and the petitioner did not press the petition, which was disposed of along with pending applications.
None granted; petition disposed of as not pressed, pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
AMAR NATH DIWEDI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Himanshu Shukla, Adv. through Vc.
versus
INVESTORS EDUCATION AND PROTECTION FUND AUTHORITY AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr. Kushagra Kumar, Mr. Amit Kumar Rana, Advs. for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R D E R % 12.12.2025
“(a)Hold the Contemnors guilty of contempt and punish them for wilful disobedience and non-adherence of order dated 14.05.2024 passed by this Hon’ble Court in Amar nath Diwedi vs Investors Education and Protection Fund Authority and Ors. W.P.(C) No. 15194 of 2023 ;
(b)Pass such other and further order(s) as it may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2025 at 12:21:34
AMIT SHARMA, J
DECEMBER 12, 2025 / kr/db
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2025 at 12:21:34
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amar Nath Diwedi
Investors Education and Protection Fund Authority
Union of India (through counsel)
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
