Allowed
Himanshu Goyal v. State (Nct of Delhi ) & Anr.
Delhi HCCONT.CAS(C)/1111/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This was an application under the Contempt of Courts Act seeking to start contempt proceedings against an SHO for alleged refusal to comply with a direction to share mobile numbers and make daily calls. The court noted respondent's submission that calls were made but were sometimes unanswered. The court extended the protection period for two weeks and directed the constable to maintain records.
What did the court decide?
The protection under the previous order extended for two weeks from the date of this order; the Beat Constable directed to maintain a record of calls made.