Dismissed
Bhavna Kaur v. State & Anr.
Delhi HCFAO/8/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for non-appearance and non-prosecution of the appellant; no one appeared on several prior hearing dates despite the respondent's counsel being present.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~12
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- FAO 8/2019, CM APPL. 1037/2019 & CM APPL. 1038/2019
¶4
- BHAVNA KAUR .....Appellant
¶5
Through: None.
¶6
versus
¶7
STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghvendra Upadhyay, Ms. Purnima Jain & Mr. Vaibhav Tripathi, Advs. for R1.
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA
¶9
- O R D E R
¶10
- % 11.03.2025
¶11
- No one appeared for the appellant when the matter was called.
¶12
- No one has been appearing for the appellant on several prior dates of hearing.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Bhavna Kaur
- respondent
State
- respondent
Anr.
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Aman Singh Vs Sh Badal Kumar Deputy Commissioner Municipal Corporation of Delhi
General Secretary Cel Retired Employees Welfare Association (Celrewa) on Behalf of the Retired Non Vs Shri Chetan Prakash Jain & Anr.
General Secretary Cel Retired Employees Welfare Association (Celrewa) on Behalf of the Retired Exe Vs Shri Chetan Prakash Jain & Anr.
State Bank of India Vs M/S Pp Jewellers Private Limited