Disposed

Adib Fatema Nomani v. the Commissioner of Police and Anr.

Delhi HC16 Apr 2025CONT.CAS(C)/1022/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Compliance proceedings in a contempt case over leave encashment. Respondent issued an order for Rs.6,84,480 leave encashment, which petitioner received; her claim for 18% interest was not entertained since the underlying writ order did not direct interest, with liberty to approach the Writ Court.

What did the court decide?

Leave encashment amount paid; no interest granted, liberty to approach Writ Court for interest claim.

Adib Fatema Nomani Vs the Commissioner of Police and Anr. — Contempt of Court | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CONT.CAS(C) 1022/2024

¶4

ADIB FATEMA NOMANI .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Petitioner in-person.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. T.P. Singh, SSC for GNCTD with ASI Satya Pal Singh.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

¶9

O R D E R % 16.04.2025

¶10

Counsel for the respondent states that they have now decided on the representation of the petitioner.

¶11

Counsel for the respondent hands up a status report filed on 26^th July 2024, which is, however, not on record.

¶12

As per the status report, the representation of the petitioner was decided and an order for leave encashment of Rs.6,84,480/- has been issued in petitioner’s favour.

¶13

The petitioner, who appears in person, states that she has received the same, however, is claiming Rs.4,72,291.20/- towards 18% interest due from the month of December 2020 till the month of September 2024.

¶14

Considering the order of which compliance is sought does not indicate that any interest would be payable, petitioner is at liberty to seek further directions from the Writ Court in this regard.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/04/2025 at 11:45:06

¶16

The judgment of which compliance is dated 20^th May 2024 in W.P.(C) 7277/2024, where the following directions were passed:

¶17

The petition is, therefore, disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to address her grievance relating to the interest amount, in appropriate proceedings.

¶18

Status report be placed on record.

¶19

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶20

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶21

APRIL 16, 2025/MK/ bp

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 23/04/2025 at 11:45:06

Adib Fatema Nomani v. the Commissioner of Police and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Adib Fatema Nomani v. the Commissioner of Police and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gulzar Ali Vs Ashwani Kumar and Anr.

Mrs Abhilasha Chauhan and Anr. Vs Mr. Ankur Rajput

Pankaj Mittal & Anr. Vs Gajanan S. Kale & Anr.

Ms. X Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) and Ors.

Gauri Kappal Vs Mintu Kumar Mishra

Gurnam Singh Vs Sh. Govind Mohan & Ors.

Ram Kumar Vs Deputy Commissioner of Police, North West Delhi and Anr.

Ritesh Mishra Vs Anamika Kashyap

Jai Shanker & Ors. Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi-East (Edmc)

Gulzar Ali Vs Ashwani Kumar and Anr.

Mrs Abhilasha Chauhan and Anr. Vs Mr. Ankur Rajput

Sompal Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sunny Arya Vs Bhawna Arya

Firoz Bakht Ahmed Vs Sh. Naresh Kumar & Ors.