Smithkline Beecham Limited v. Hari Ome Pandey and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Rectification petition under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act seeking cancellation of a Class 35 trade mark registration. Respondent no.1 did not appear and had itself sought withdrawal of the mark. The court directed the Registry to act on the withdrawal request and remove the entry.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the Trade Marks Registry to act on respondent no.1's withdrawal request and remove the impugned entry from the Register; copy to be sent for compliance.