Suit between pharmaceutical parties settled; joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC sought recording of settlement. Court found terms lawful, bound parties to them, and decreed the suit in terms of the settlement.
Suit decreed in terms of the settlement application; parties bound by its terms.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~5
NOVARTIS AG & ANR. .....Plaintiffs
Through: Mr. Abhay Tandon, Ms. Mamta Jha and Mr. Siddhant Sharma, Advocates.
versus
NATCO PHARMA LIMITED .....Defendant
Through: Mr. Afzal B. Khan, Mr. Samik Mukherjee, Ms. Amrita Majumdar, Mr. Dominic A. and Mr. Sharad Besoya, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 09.05.2025
I.A. 11903/2025 (O-XXIII Rule 3 of CPC)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2025 at 11:34:51
Page 1 of 2
CS(COMM) 229/2019
unlawful therein.
CS(COMM) 229/2019
AMIT BANSAL, J
MAY 9, 2025 kd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/05/2025 at 11:34:51
Page 2 of 2
CS(COMM) 229/2019
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Novartis AG & Anr.
Natco Pharma Limited
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
