Petitioner sought withdrawal of its company petition and pending applications; counsel stated she was so instructed, and the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petition and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~C-13
LAFARGE AGGREGATES & CONCRETE INDIA PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nehal Gupta, Advocate (VC)
versus
TOPLINE BUILD-TECH PVT LTD .....Respondent Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
PRATEEK JALAN, J
DECEMBER 2, 2025 Dy/JM/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/12/2025 at 11:11:32
LAFARGE AGGREGATES & CONCRETE INDIA PVT LTD
TOPLINE BUILD-TECH PVT LTD
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
