The High Court of Delhi dismissed a writ petition challenging a trial court order that permitted a respondent to summon the GST Department to supply records in a recovery suit, finding no infirmity in the lower court's decision.
The petitioners' applications were dismissed; the impugned orders were allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
M/S RNT METALS PVT. LTD .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Mayank Rustagi, Advocate.
versus
RAKA OVERSEAS THROUGH
ITS PROPRIETOR SURABH JAIN .....Respondent Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 10.01.2025
CM APPLs. 72101-02/2024 (for exemptions)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
These applications stand disposed of.
CM(M) 4029/2024 & CM APPL. 72103/2024 (stay)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 13:00:28
witnesses on record.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
JANUARY 10, 2025/ vp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 13:00:28
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to challenge the trial court's permission to summon a witness from the GST Department for production of tax records in a suit for recovery.
M/s RNT Metals Pvt. Ltd.
Raka Overseas
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
