Petition under Article 227 challenged a trial court order closing the petitioners' right to file written statement. Counsel sought withdrawal to first apply before the trial court for review or extension of time; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~56
RAM DHIRAJ TIWARI AND ANR
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Tushar Kwatra & Mr. Shubham Aggarwal, Advocates
versus
PHOOLWATI
.....Respondent
Through: None
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R % 09.01.2025
CM APPL. 723/2025 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CM(M) 16/2025 & CM APPL. 722/2025 (Stay)
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:36:00
respondent under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, which was allowed and appellant No. 2 was impleaded as defendant No. 2 in the civil suit. It is also submitted that the plaint of the respondent was also amended.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
JANUARY 9, 2025
RM
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 12:36:00
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ram Dhiraj Tiwari and Anr
Phoolwati
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
