Kshitij Gupta v. Jagdip Singh Bedi and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Two-paragraph Delhi High Court order dated 04.03.2025 by Justice Ravinder Dudeja in CM(M) 3800/2024 with stay application CM APPL. 65870/2024 (Kshitij Gupta v. Jagdip Singh Bedi and Anr.; counsel Anil Kumar Maurya). Petition dismissed as withdrawn after counsel stated it had become infructuous following the respondents' payment of arrears of rent. No statutes cited, no precedents cited, no issues framed, no holdings, no monetary award — of minimal precedential value; useful only as a record of withdrawal/dismissal.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; statement of counsel taken on record and petition dismissed as withdrawn, counsel having stated the petition had become infructuous as the respondents made payment of arrears of rent. ¶12