Writ petition challenging a trial court order permitting an objector to participate in probate proceedings in a limited capacity was not pressed after the objector stated she did not wish to cross-examine witnesses; the High Court dismissed it as withdrawn with liberty to seek settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
resp. no. 2 to 5 from array of parties)
DHARAM PAUL SONI AND ORS .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. Tarun Chandiok with Mr. Varun Chandiok and Ms.Anubhi Goyal, Advs.
versus
STATE AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Swastik Singh, Adv. for R-10.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 04.03.2025
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 12:25:32
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
MARCH 4, 2025/ sky/ia
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/03/2025 at 12:25:32
Dharam Paul Soni and Ors
State
Neena Kukar
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
