Petition seeking directions to the trial court to hear final arguments in a 2016 suit on the fixed date and dispose of it expeditiously. The High Court disposed of the petition with an expectation that the trial court would hear arguments and decide the matter promptly, requesting no adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~64
AMBRISH SAXENA .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Jyotika Kalra, Ms. Ayushi Chug and Mr. Aditya Jha, Advs.
versus
SANJAY GUPTA & ANR.
.....Respondent
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 27.01.2025 CM APPL. 4766/2025 (EXEMPTION)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
CM(M) 160/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/01/2025 at 12:40:04
citizen, the petition is disposed of with the expectation that the trial court would hear the arguments on 21.04.2025 and therafter shall dispose of the matter as expeditiously as possible.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
JANUARY 27, 2025/ib
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/01/2025 at 12:40:04
Ambrish Saxena
Sanjay Gupta
Anr.
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
