Aizaz Kilicheva @ Aziza @ Maya Vs State NCT of Delhi

By way of the present application filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, the petitioner seeks modification of bail condition imposed vide para 46.1 of judgment dated 21.01.2025, whereby this court has admitted the petitioner to regular bail. The condition reads as follows :

¶12

“ 46.1. The petitioner shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) with 02 local sureties in the like amount, one of which must be from a family member, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court; ”

¶13

Mr. Varun Narang, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner is a foreign national she is not in a position to furnish surety from a family member . He further argues

¶14

Page 1 of 3

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. BAIL APPLN. 1872/2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2025 at 12:22:59

¶16

that the amount of personal bond and surety, namely Rs. 50,000/- is also excessive. Counsel accordingly prays that the aforesaid condition be modified appropriately to make it possible for the petitioner to comply therewith.

¶17

Upon being queried as to why the petitioner is unable to furnish surety of her pairokar , who is her sister and had filed the affidavit in support of the bail petition, counsel submits that though the petitioner’s sister as well as her son are presently in India, they do not have any underlying assets to furnish the requisite surety.

¶18

Counsel however expresses that petitioner would be able to furnish a personal bond and 02 local sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each, without the condition that at least one of the sureties should be from a family member.

¶19

Issue notice.

¶20

Ms. Manjeet Arya, learned APP appears for the State; accepts notice; and leaves it to the court to pass appropriate orders.

¶21

Taking a sympathetic view of the case, the condition in para 46.1 of judgment dated 21.01.2025 is modified limited to the extent that the petitioner is permitted to be released on regular bail subject to furnishing a personal bond in a sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five Thousand Only) with 02 local sureties in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court.

¶22

All other conditions imposed vide judgment dated 21.01.2025 shall remain as they-are.

¶23

The application is disposed-of in the above terms.

¶24

Page 2 of 3

¶25

This is a digitally signed order. BAIL APPLN. 1872/2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2025 at 12:22:59

¶26

A copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

¶27

BAIL APPLN. 1872/2024

¶28

The bail petition already stood disposed-of vide judgment dated 21.01.2025.

¶29

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J

¶30

JANUARY 30, 2025/ ss

¶31

Page 3 of 3

¶32

This is a digitally signed order. BAIL APPLN. 1872/2024 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2025 at 12:22:59

Aizaz Kilicheva @ Aziza @ Maya v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aizaz Kilicheva @ Aziza @ Maya v. State NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohsim @ Abid Hussain Vs State NCT of Delhi

Vikas@Vickey Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Icici Bank Ltd. Vs Abhay Kumar Yadav & Anr.

Jatin Yadav Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Mr. Sachin Agarwal Vs Divya Sharma

Pankaj Kumar Vs the Stae of N.C.T.of Delhi & Anr.