Allowed¶22

Vikas@Vickey v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC20 Jan 2025BAIL APPLN./4634/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Vikas@Vickey — Delhi High Court interim-bail extension order dated 19.02.2025 (CRL.M.(BAIL) 358/2025 under BAIL APPLN. 4634/2024; Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J.); Section 483 BNSS 2023 application; grounds: wife's heart surgery (01.02.2025), discharge (05.02.2025), one-month bed rest/'light duties', no caregiver in family; interim bail of 20.01.2025 extended by 02 weeks on same conditions; surrender otherwise due 21.02.2025.

What did the court decide?

Interim bail granted vide order dated 20.01.2025 extended by another 02 weeks, subject to the same conditions as were imposed earlier; the application stands disposed-of. ¶22

Vikas@Vickey Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~32

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 4634/2024

¶4

VIKAS@VICKEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mohd. Suza Faisal, Advocate via video-conferencing.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastva, APP for the State with SI Rohit, ANTF Crime Branch.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R

¶9

% 19.02.2025

¶10

CRL.M.(BAIL) 358/2025

¶11

By way of the present application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner/applicant seeks extension of interim bail granted to him vide order dated 20.01.2025.

¶12

The interim bail was granted on the ground that the petitioner’s wife required to undergo surgery.

¶13

The petitioner is supposed to surrender on 21.02.2025.

¶14

The petitioner has appended with the present application a copy of his wife’s discharge summary dated 05.02.2025, which records that she has undergone heart surgery on 01.02.2025; and has been discharged on 05.02.2025.

¶15

Mr. Mohd. Suza Faisal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner draws attention to prescription dated 13.02.2025, where the doctors have advised to the wife bed rest for 01 month with ‘ light duties ’.

¶16

BAIL APPLN. 4634/2024 Page 1 of 2

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2025 at 12:07:58

¶19

Counsel submits, that there is no one in the family to look after the wife; and until the wife is able to manage the affairs of the household, he be granted extension of interim bail.

¶20

Issue notice.

¶21

Mr. Tarang Srivastva, learned APP appears on behalf of the State on advance copy; accepts notice; and leaves it to the court to pass appropriate orders.

¶22

Considering the circumstances of the case, the application is allowed extending the interim bail, granted to the petitioner vide order dated 20.01.2025, by another 02 weeks subject to the same conditions as were imposed earlier.

¶23

Application stands disposed-of.

¶24

BAIL APPLN. 4634/2024

¶25

Petition already stood disposed-of vide order dated 20.01.2025.

¶26

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J

¶27

FEBRUARY 19, 2025 ds

¶28

BAIL APPLN. 4634/2024 Page 2 of 2

¶29

This is a digitally signed order.

¶30

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/02/2025 at 12:07:58

Vikas@Vickey v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vikas@Vickey v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Inderjeet @Shyam Vs State (Nct of Delhi) through S.H.O, P.S. Shakarpur

Rahul Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Prakash Industries Ltd. Vs Subhi Wire & Steel Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Mohsim @ Abid Hussain Vs State NCT of Delhi

Icici Bank Ltd. Vs Abhay Kumar Yadav & Anr.

Ranjan Kumar Gautam & Ors. Vs State & Anr.