Allowed

Raj Kumar v. the State (N.C.T.) of Delhi

Delhi HC17 Apr 2025BAIL APPLN./1405/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court granted bail to the applicant under Section 483 of the BNSS in a cheating case registered under IPC Sections 420 and 120B, noting the settlement via MoU and receipt of money by the complainant, subject to conditions including a personal bond, restriction on leaving India, and maintaining contact with the Investigating Officer.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicant released on bail with personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- and one surety of like amount subject to specified conditions.

Raj Kumar Vs the State (N.C.T.) of Delhi — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~51

¶2

IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 1405/2025

¶4

RAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocate. versus

¶6

THE STATE (N.C.T.) OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for the State with Ms. Mansi Sharma, Advocate.

¶7

SI Sahil Gahlawat, P.S. Bindapur and HC Parmod, P.S. Cyber Dwarka. Mr. Narender Kumar Rana, father of the complainant in person through Vc.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶9

O R D E R % 17.04.2025

¶10

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶11

The present application under Section 483 of the BNSS seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 160/2023, under Sections 420/120B of the IPC, registered at P.S. Cyber Police Station Dwarka.

¶12

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the matter has been settled with the complainant through his father, Mr. Narender Kumar Rana vide an MoU on 11.03.2025 and in pursuance of which, Rs. 53,000/- has been received by the complainant’s father.

¶13

Status report dated 12.04.2025 authored by SHO, P.S. Cyber Dwarka has been placed on record whereby, the aforesaid MoU has been verified.

¶14

Mr. Narender Kumar Rana, father of the complainant appears through

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 00:20:06

¶16

video conferencing, correctly identified by the Investigation Officer, submits that he has settled the dispute with the present applicant and has received the sum of Rs. 53,000/- as stated in the MoU.

¶17

On a pointed query from the Investigating Officer, he submits that the current account which is the subject matter of the investigation was opened by the present applicant, however, nothing has been come on record so far regarding the fact that whether the present applicant was operating the said account after its opening. It is stated in the status report that the said account was opened at the instance of one, Vikas and the present applicant after opening of the said account had handed over the details and SIM card to the said, Vikas, and a sum of Rs. 12,000/- was taken by him as token money for opening of the said bank account.

¶18

In totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, the present application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety of like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/Link Court, further subject to following conditions: -

¶19

i. The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the learned Trial Court.

¶20

ii. The applicant shall intimate the learned Trial Court by way of an affidavit and to the Investigating Officer regarding any change in residential address.

¶21

iii. The applicant shall appear before the learned Trial Court as and when the matter is taken up for hearing.

¶22

iv. The applicant is directed to give his mobile number to the Investigating Officer and keep it operational at all times.

¶23

¶24

v. The applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, tamper with evidence or try to influence the witness in any manner.

¶25

The application is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

¶26

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶27

Needless to state, nothing mentioned hereinabove, is an opinion on the merits of the case and any observations made herein are only for the purpose of the present bail application.

¶28

Copy of the order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for necessary information and compliance.

¶29

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court forthwith .

¶30

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶31

APRIL 17, 2025/bsr

¶32

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶33

This is a digitally signed order.

¶34

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 00:20:06

Raj Kumar v. the State (N.C.T.) of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kumar v. the State (N.C.T.) of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mehta Prasantbhai Mukundray Partner M/S Coal Corporation Vs M/S Magnifico Minerals Pvt. Ltd.

Vikas Kumar & Ors. Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr. & Ors.

Meena Sharma Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Pawan Singh Vs State of NCT of Delhi

M/S Mgi Developers and Promoters and Anr. Vs Sh Sumit Bansal

Raj Mishra Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi