Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator for disputes under a clearing and forwarding agency agreement. Respondent did not dispute the arbitration clause. Court appointed a sole arbitrator and referred the disputes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
M/S AJS ENTERPRISES .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Prayuj Sharma and Mr. Sivagnam Kartikeyan, Advocates.
versus
ENGLISH BROWNE INDIA LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arjun Kochhar, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
%
08.08.2025
ARB.P. 869/2025
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/08/2025 at 12:13:57
comprising of a Sole Arbitrator. The following directions are issued in this regard:
AMIT BANSAL, J
AUGUST 8, 2025 Rzu
ARB.P. 869/2025
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/08/2025 at 12:13:57
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an arbitrator should be appointed for disputes under the agreement dated 23 August 2023 between the parties.
3 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S AJS Enterprises
English Browne India Limited
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
