Disposed

M/S Moneywise Financial Services Private Limited v. Ibooks Institute Private Limited through Its Directors and Others

Delhi HC8 Jul 2025ARB.P./1085/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act seeking appointment of an arbitrator for loan disputes under a Master Loan Agreement. Respondents were served by publication and did not appear; the court appointed a sole arbitrator under DIAC rules and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Sole arbitrator appointed; arbitration under DIAC aegis; parties to approach arbitrator within two weeks.

M/S Moneywise Financial Services Private Limited Vs Ibooks… — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~2

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- ARB.P. 1085/2024 & I.A. 9559/2025

¶4

M/S MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED

¶5

.....Petitioner Through: Ms. Arunima Sinh Jadaun, Adv. versus

¶6

IBOOKS INSTITUTE PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTORS AND OTHERS .....Respondent Through: None

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

¶8

O R D E R % 08.07.2025

¶9

This is a petition filed under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties arising out of Master Loan Agreement dated 08.02.2018.

¶10

The petitioner had advanced a loan of Rs. 25 lakhs to the respondents. The respondent Nos. 2 and 3 are the co-borrowers and the loan was to be repaid in 36 instalments.

¶11

The said Agreement contains an arbitration clause being Clause No. 10.1 which reads as under:-

¶12

“10.1 Any disputes, differences, controversies and questions directly or indirectly arising at any time hereafter between the Parties or their respective representatives or assigns, arising out of or in connection with this Agreement (or the subject matter of the Agreement), including, without limitation any question regarding its existence, validity,

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2025 at 13:33:38

¶15

interpretation, construction, performance, enforcement, rights and liabilities of the parties, or termination (“Dispute,”), shall be referred to Sole arbitrator duly appointed by the lender. The Language of the arbitration shall be English. The seat of the Arbitration shall be at New Delhi and the language of the proceedings shall be English. The Award shall be in writing and shall set out the reasons for the Arbitrator's decision. The costs and expenses of the Arbitration shall be borne equally by each Party, with each costs and expenses of the Arbitration shall be borne equally by each party, with each party paying {or its own fees and costs including attorney fees, except as may be determined b}J the arbitral tribunal. Any award by the Arbitration tribunal shall be final and binding".

¶16

Since the respondents defaulted in repaying the loan, the petitioner issued Loan Recall/ Termination Notice dated 10.02.2021 and thereafter, the petitioner invoked arbitration vide Notice dated 14.06.2024.

¶17

Vide order dated 15.04.2025, the application under Order V Rule XX of of CPC was allowed and the respondents were directed to be served through publication in the national daily newspapers “The Hindu” and “Dainik Jagran”, Delhi Edition and “The Hindu” and “Pratidin”, Bhubaneswar Edition.

¶18

As per the service report, the respondents have been served. Despite service, there is nobody appearing on behalf of the respondents today.

¶19

I am satisfied that there are disputes subsisting between the parties and the same can be resolved by way of arbitral mechanism.

¶20

For the said reasons, the petition is allowed and the following directions are issued:-

¶21

This is a digitally signed order.

¶22

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2025 at 13:33:38

¶23

i) Mr. Devansh Gupta (Advocate) (Mob. No. 9871209110) is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

¶24

ii) The arbitration will be held under the aegis and rules of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre, Delhi High Court, Sher Shah Road, New Delhi (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘DIAC’).

¶25

iii) The remuneration of the learned Arbitrator shall be in terms of DIAC (Administrative Cost and Arbitrators’ Fees) Rules, 2018.

¶26

iv) The learned Arbitrator is requested to furnish a declaration in terms of Section 12 of the Act prior to entering into the reference.

¶27

v) It is made clear that all the rights and contentions of the parties, including as to the arbitrability of any of the claim, any other preliminary objection, as well as claims/counter-claims and merits of the dispute of either of the parties, are left open for adjudication by the learned arbitrator.

¶28

vi) The parties shall approach the learned Arbitrator within two weeks from today.

¶29

The present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶30

JASMEET SINGH, J

¶31

JULY 8, 2025/sp

¶32

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶33

This is a digitally signed order.

¶34

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/07/2025 at 13:33:38

M/S Moneywise Financial Services Private Limited v. Ibooks Institute Private Limited through Its Directors and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Moneywise Financial Services Private Limited v. Ibooks Institute Private Limited through Its Directors and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Axis Finance Limited Vs Rohit Sang & Anr.

M/S Ahluwalia Contracts (India) Ltd. Vs Union of India

Mohinder Pal Kamboj Vs M/S Fiitjee Limited

Paddy Hospitality Private Limited and Anr. Vs Yammy Food and Beverages LLP and Ors.

M/S Gaurav Enterprises Vs the Lady Hardinge Medical College and Smt. Sucheta Kriplani -Lhmc and Ssk Hospital, New Delhi

Surendra Kumar Vs C.B.I.