Petitioner sought release of goods seized by MCD, disputing the contents of the seizure memo. The Court held the petitioner had an independent legal remedy against the seizure memo and dismissed the application for release, disposing of the writ petition and cancelling the next hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PARVESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Ms. Pralika Chakraborty, Mr. Kailash Kr. Jha and Mr. Anjani Kr. Mishra, Advs.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaganmeet Singh Sachdeva, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Sehaj Karan Singh and Mr. Hridyesh Khanna, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 06.08.2025
CM APPL.47899/2025 (Directions for release of goods seized on 27.06.2025)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2025 at 15:35:43
available in law.
W.P.(C) 9697/2025
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J
ANISH DAYAL, J
AUGUST 6, 2025/MK/tk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2025 at 15:35:43
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was entitled to directions for release of goods seized on 27.06.2025 when the seizure memo had been served but its contents were disputed.
Parvesh Kumar
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Nitin Wasudeo Sambre
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
