Writ petition by Shreeank Finhold Pvt. Ltd. dismissed for non-prosecution and in default as the petitioner remained unrepresented and appeared uninterested in continuing the proceedings.
Petitioner continued in default and the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, Central Government Standing Counsel with Mr. Kushagra Kumar and Mr. Amit Kumar Rana, Advocates for UOI.
Mr. Ripin Sood, Panel Counsel for GNCTD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
JYOTI SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 3, 2025/ jg
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2025 at 15:17:17
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
