Writ petition not pressed by the petitioner's counsel after arguments; the Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition and pending application as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
RAVI GUPTA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Arya, Mr. Aditya Kumar Yadav, Mr. Rishabh Malhotra and Mr. Rishabh Dubey, Advocates.
versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCTD) AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing Counsel for Respondents No. 1 and 2. Mr. Sanyam Malik, Advocate for R-3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
% 03.02.2025
JYOTI SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 03, 2025/shivam
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2025 at 14:51:44
Ravi Gupta
State (Govt. of NCTD)
Anr.
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
