Veg Raj v. UOI &Ors
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi; writ petition; oral order; prayer for direction; OCR-damaged/illegible scan; two-justice bench (names illegible); March date fragment; August date fragment ('AUGST 1,205'); no extractable holdings, citations, quantum, or disposition.
What the court decided
$~
* IN THEGCOURFDLAW DELHI
+ 2 39/P(C) 8 0. W
VEG RAJ P eti onr .
roug:T h Mr. Suod ary ksh TP a wr, i
Advocate
s ver
I &RSU O dtpoR esn.
roug:T h Mr . rajN e , SPC with Mr .
Vedansh Aad n , GP and Mr . Soumyadip
botyk r Ch a , Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICAK
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICPAK
ORDE (ORAL)
01.825
1. The only paye in this writ pe r on was for a d ti recton to i
t p e o fyvP r au ih 3c ondt p Res
dRv i sa e My03.Th 2 te da sion Pe cbyo rdn s a eti o
0. 2 Mrch 5 te da
2. dra te h i w o t klav se onr i p et hiruman, esc h t In
writ eonhl pby as dci o f e t h on sRv i
thl. w orde in ac
3. poe sd on ti sid. Thpndfor ea g s ert yb i v ndlL ea
ithdrn. wa sof,
C.HARI SNK,J
OM PRAKSHUL,J.
AUGST 1,205/ yg
Page 1 of
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
The writ petition carried a single prayer seeking a direction; the precise object of the direction and the referenced order(s)/decision (which carry only a garbled March date fragment, 'Mrch 5') are illegible owing to OCR corruption of the scan.low confidence¶1
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court