Petitioner withdrew the writ petition after partial hearing, with liberty to raise the issues and defences before GSFC; legal remedies against any adverse decision reserved.
Liberty to withdraw petition and pursue issues/defences before GSFC; legal remedies against GSFC decision reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
TUSHAR GHOSH .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Vivekanand Mishra, SPC, Mr. Ripudaman Bharadwaj, CGSC, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik and Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Advs, Mr. Paramveer Singh, Law Officer
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER (ORAL) % 01.08.2025
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. After some hearing, Ms. Lamba, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with permission to urge the issues in this writ petition as well as all other defences available to her client before GSFC.
W.P.(C) 11368/2025
Page 1 of 2
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:06.08.2025 10:55:09
2. Needless to say, in case the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the GSFC, the remedies available in law shall remain reserve.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.
AUGUST 1, 2025/ AT
W.P.(C) 11368/2025
Page 2 of 2
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:06.08.2025 10:55:09
Tushar Ghosh
Union of India and Ors
C. Hari Shankar
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
