Dismissed¶¶18

Ms. Priyanka Nehra v. Union of India and Anr.

Delhi HC11 Aug 2025W.P.(C)/7597/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawn writ petition. Keywords: W.P.(C) 7597/2019; High Court of Delhi; Amit Sharma J.; 11.08.2025; Article 226 Constitution of India; writ of mandamus; scholarship release Rs.32,09,000/-; Centrally Sponsored Scheme of Post-Metric Scholarship for SC students; CPL Course; petitioner Priyanka Nehra; leave to withdraw granted; dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of; pending applications disposed; no adjudication on merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw the petition (leave granted); petition dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly; pending application(s) disposed of. No monetary or mandamus relief granted. ¶¶18

Ms. Priyanka Nehra Vs Union of India and Anr. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2025)

¶1

$~28

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 7597/2019

¶4

MS. PRIYANKA NEHRA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Simran Bajaj, Advocate.

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gigi C. George and Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Manashwy Jha, Advocate for Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Panel Counsel (Civil) GNCTD.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 11.08.2025

¶10

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶11

The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks following prayers:-

¶12

“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble court may graciously be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other order or direction in the nature of Mandamus whereby directing the respondents to ensure the release of scholarship amount of Rs.32,09,000/- in accordance of Centrally Sponsored Scheme of Post-Metric Scholarship for SC students for pursuing CPL Course, in favour of the petitioner, in the interest of justice.

¶13

Any other or further order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.”

¶14

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order.

¶16

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:47:04

¶17

Leave granted.

¶18

The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

¶19

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶20

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶21

AUGUST 11, 2025 /sn/yg

¶22

This is a digitally signed order.

¶23

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2025 at 12:47:04

Ms. Priyanka Nehra v. Union of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms. Priyanka Nehra v. Union of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Singh Vs the Regional Labour Commissioner Central & Anr.

Manoj Chauhan Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 5 & Anr.

Quattro Realcon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Acit Circle 19(1), Delhi

Sangeeta Negi Vs Bharti Public School, through Its Manager & Ors.

Mr Deepak Duggal Vs Delhi Development Authority

Kings Dorian Exports Vs Irfan

M/S Elementto Lifestyles Vs Mr. Deepak Singh Bora

Santosh Kumar Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Rajni Vs Shri Ashwani Kumar, Commissioner, MCD and Anr.

Ajay Garg Vs University of Delhi

Minatirani Mohapatra, Vs Mahesh Prasad Mishra & Ors.

Dipawali Vs Employee State Insurance Corporation and Anr.

Geetika Gulati Vs Chetan Anand & Anr.

Sunil Kumar Sharma Vs Mamta Yadav