Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition concerning a service matter, with liberty to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with the liberty prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~43
Through: Mr. Ved Prakash Tripathi, Advocate (through VC)
versus
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF AUDIT AND ANR.
.....Respondents Through: Dr. S. S. Hooda, Standing Counsel for CAG.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
O R D E R % 17.11.2025
SACHIN DATTA, J
NOVEMBER 17, 2025/r
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/11/2025 at 12:12:10
Manisha Tyagi
The Director General of Audit
Anr.
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
