Disposed
P.C.Sharma v. UOI & Ors.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/4016/2004
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition before the Delhi High Court was not pressed by the petitioner's counsel and was accordingly disposed of as not pressed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~3
¶2
- I� THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT �EW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 4016/2004
¶4
- P.C.SHARMA .....Petitioner
¶5
Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, Ms. Shweta Priyadarshini, Ms. Nishi Singh and Mr. Avinash, Advs.
¶6
versus
¶7
UOI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Saxena, Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari and Ms. Poonam Shukla, Advs.
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HO�'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHA�KAR HO�'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
¶10
- O R D E R (ORAL)
¶11
- % 15.11.2025
¶12
1. Mr. Arvind Nigam, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner does not press this writ petition.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
P.C. Sharma
- respondent
UOI
- respondent
Ors.
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court