A writ petition by a serving force member against the Union of India was disposed of as infructuous after counsel stated, on instructions, that events during its pendency rendered it unnecessary. The court recorded no findings on any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
FORCE NO.0583941 SATBIR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anshuman Mehrotra, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Himanshu Pathak SPC with Mr. Amit Singh, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
O R D E R (ORAL) % 17.11.2025
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that owing to the events that have transpired during the pendency of this petition, the petition has become infructuous and is accordingly disposed of.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J
NOVEMBER 17, 2025/pa
Signature Not Verified
Signed By:PREETI Signing Date:19.11.2025 12:54:26
Force No.0583941 Satbir
Union of India and ors
C. Hari Shankar
Om Prakash Shukla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
