Petitioner in a writ petition against the Union of India and others sought and obtained leave to withdraw, with liberty to pursue other legal remedies; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw with liberty to seek other appropriate legal remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
MR AMIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lakshay Yadav, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pathak, SC with Mr. Sunil Kr. Jha, Mr. M. S. Akhtar, Mr. Sami S. Siddiqui, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs. for R-1 Ms. Shobhana Takair, SC with Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Mr. Shivam Takiar, Mr. Prateek Dhir, Advs. for DDA
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
MAY 5, 2025/ j
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:55:52
Amit Kumar
Union of India
Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
