Petition sought defreezing of the petitioner's current account held with UCO Bank. The bank stated before the court that the account had already been defreezed, rendering the petition infructuous; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~184
versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arnav Kumar, CGSC with Ms. Gitanjali Vohra, Advs.for R-1 Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Ms. Mirza Amir Baig and Mr. Abdul Wahid Mashhal, Advs. for R-3/UCO Bank.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 06.05.2025
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
MAY 6, 2025/ N.S. ASWAL
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 00:01:05
Royal Trading Company
Union of India
UCO Bank
Vikas Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
