Petitioner withdrew High Court writ petition with leave granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
Leave granted to withdraw; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
SURAJ PRAKASH YADAV .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Srutishma Hazarika, Mr. Neeraj, Mr. Dipanshu Meena and Ms. Heena Khatun, Advs.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Singh and Mr. Praveen Kumar Kaushik, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R
% 16.01.2025
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file the same afresh.
Leave granted.
Accordingly, the petition alongwith pending application(s), if any, is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for.
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J.
JANUARY 16, 2025 p
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/01/2025 at 14:30:58
Suraj Prakash Yadav
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Chandra Dhari Singh
Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
