Elitecast Media Private Limited Vs Idbi Trusteeship Services Ltd.

¶1

$~40

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 527/2025

¶4

ELITECAST MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aman Varma, Mr. Dhaval Mehrotra, Ms. Riya Wasade, Ms. Aditi Desai and Ms. Jasleen Virk, Advocates

¶6

versus

¶7

IDBI TRUSTEESHIP SERVICES LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rajeev Saxena, Mr. Deboshree Saha and Mr. Kashish Narang, Advocates

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA

¶10

O R D E R % 17.01.2025

¶11

The instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:

¶12

“(A) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside order dated 05.12.2024 passed by the Ld. DRAT, New Delhi in Interlocutory Application No. 1092 of 2024 in Misc. Appeal No. 21 of 2024;

¶13

(B) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the Ld. DRAT, New Delhi to expedite the proceedings under Misc. Appeal No. 21 of 2024;

¶14

(C) Pending the hearing and final disposal of this Petition, this

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:24:44

¶16

Hon’ble Court be pleased to grant stay of proceedings in Original Application No. 925 of 2021 pending before the Ld. DRT-III, New Delhi;

¶17

(D) Pending the hearing and final disposal of Misc. Appeal No. 21 of 2024, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to grant stay of proceedings in Original Application No. 925 of 2021 pending before the Ld. DRT-III, New Delhi;

¶18

(E) Ad-interim orders in terms of prayers (A), (B), (C), (D) above;

¶19

(F) For costs of the petition and orders thereon; and

¶20

(G) Issue such other writ, direction or order which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the present case.”

¶21

Mr. Jayant Mehta, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that if the appeal bearing Misc. Appeal No. 21 of 2024 is not decided in the month of January, it shall become infructuous. Therefore, he prayed that the learned DRAT may be directed to expedite the hearing of the said appeal and dispose of the same, expeditiously.

¶22

Mr. Rajeev Saxena, learned counsel for the respondent appearing on advance notice has no objection for the expeditious disposal of the aforesaid pending appeal.

¶23

Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and perused the records.

¶24

Taking into consideration the contention made by learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that if the matter shall not be heard and decided in the month of January, the appeal shall become infructuous, it is requested that the learned DRAT shall hear and decide the Misc. Appeal No. 21 of 2024 expeditiously, preferably within two weeks.

¶25

With the aforesaid directions, the instant petition stands disposed of

¶26

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:24:44

¶27

along with pending applications, if any.

¶28

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J

¶29

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J

¶30

JANUARY 17, 2025 gs/mk

¶31

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

¶32

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 19:24:44

Elitecast Media Private Limited v. Idbi Trusteeship Services Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Elitecast Media Private Limited v. Idbi Trusteeship Services Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prakash Industries Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 30, Delhi & Anr.

M/S Royal Security Services Vs Jaipal Singh and Ors.

Fci Handling Workers Union Vs UOI & Anr.

Rajesh Gomes Vs New Delhi Municipal Council (Ndmc) and Ors.

M/S Image Filling Station Vs National Highway Logistics Management Limited & Anr.

Staff Selection Commission & Ors. Vs Atul Baghel

Ethenic Agencies Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mr Kg Somani Erstwhile Liquidator & Ors.

Naib Sub Tej Pal Singh Vs UOI and Ors.

Maa Jhandewali Co. Operative Urban Thrift and Credit Society Ltd. Vs Union of India through the Secretary to the Government of India Ministry of Agriculture and Farm

Brahma Devi Vs Union of India & Anr.

Hawkers Surksha Foundation Vs Union of India and Ors.

Smt Longi Devi Vs New Delhi Municipal Council & Anr.

Suresh and Others Vs Union of India and Others

Shri Pankaj Chopra Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.