Petitioner sought withdrawal of two writ petitions since arbitration claims were already pending. The Delhi High Court dismissed both petitions as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18 & 19
RIVERDALE INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Karan Rajpurohit, Adv.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay K Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mr. M S Akhtar & Mr. Diwakar Kapil, Advs. for R-3/LAC
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R % 16.10.2025
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J
ANISH DAYAL, J
OCTOBER 16, 2025/sm/ bp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/10/2025 at 12:12:10
Riverdale Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
Union of India & Ors.
Nitin Wasudeo Sambre
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
