Dismissed
Kusum Jain and Aors v. D.D.A and Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/5160/2012
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed in default and for non-prosecution as petitioners and counsel repeatedly failed to appear across multiple consecutive hearings.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~8
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 5160/2012
¶4
KUSUM JAIN AND AORS .....Petitioners
¶5
Through: None.
¶6
versus
¶7
D.D.A AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Katyal, Standing Counsel for DDA with Ms. Ritika Bansal, Advocate.
¶8
CORAM:
¶9
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
¶10
O R D E R % 06.02.2025
¶11
- There is no appearance from the side of petitioners.
¶12
- This Court has seen previous consecutive orders dated 08.05.2023, 26.09.2023, 16.01.2024, 11.07.2024 and 26.11.2024 and even on those dates, nobody had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. 3. It seems that petitioners have lost interest in pursuing with the present petition.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Kusum Jain and Ors
- respondent
D.D.A
- respondent
Anr
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court