Writ petition seeking de-freezing of a bank account was withdrawn; petitioner stated it would cooperate with the investigating agency. Court disposed of the petition as not pressed, granting liberty to file afresh if needed.
Writ petition disposed of as not pressed with liberty to file afresh for de-freezing of the bank account.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~100
BANK OF BARODA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Rout, Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 with Ms. Dharna Veragi and Mr. B.N. Mishra, Advocates. Mr. Shashank Bajpai, Special Counsel for State of Odisha/respondent No.4 with Ms. Stuti Karwal, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R % 06.02.2025
MANOJ JAIN, J
FEBRUARY 6, 2025/st
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/02/2025 at 15:13:36
Any Travels
Bank of Baroda
Manoj Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
