Dismissed
Sandeep Garg v. P E C Limited
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/4714/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous and not pressed by the petitioner, disposing of all pending applications.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~10
¶2
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 4714/2017 & CM APPL. 20575/2017 SANDEEP GARG .....Petitioner Through: Mr. K.C. Mittal, Advocate. versus
¶4
P E C LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Ms. Sangeeta Sondhi & Mr. Daksh Jain, Advocates.
¶5
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
¶6
O R D E R % 07.05.2025
¶7
Mr. K.C. Mittal, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petition has been rendered infructuous.
¶8
The petition is therefore dismissed as not pressed. All pending application also stands disposed of.
¶9
PRATEEK JALAN, J
¶10
MAY 7, 2025
¶11
“pv”/
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
SANDEEP GARG
- respondent
P E C LIMITED
Coram
AI extract
PRATEEK JALAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court