Writ petition against North Delhi Municipal Corporation withdrawn by counsel as infructuous; the Delhi High Court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MANOJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv.
versus
THE COMMISSIONER NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhinav Singh and Mr. Praveen Kumar Kaushik, Advs. for MCD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
%
O R D E R 15.01.2025
1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous and that, therefore, she may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted as sought for.
2. The present writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
AJAY DIGPAUL, J.
JANUARY 15, 2025
ssc
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:18:06
MANOJ KUMAR
THE COMMISSIONER NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
C. HARI SHANKAR
AJAY DIGPAUL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
