The petitioner sought to withdraw its petition. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of all pending applications.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn; all pending applications are disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~86
M/S HYDERABAD CABLE DIGITAL SERVICE PVT. LTD.
.....Petitioner Through: Mr.Vikram Singh, Mr. Sandeep Arya, Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advs.
versus
ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD......Respondent Through: Mr. Upender Thakur, Ms. Vishakha U. Thakur, Ms. Akshita Nain, Mr. Yasheshvi Vashistha, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 14.01.2025
SACHIN DATTA, J
JANUARY 14, 2025/ uk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 15:34:13
M/S HYDERABAD CABLE DIGITAL SERVICE PVT. LTD.
ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.
SACHIN DATTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
