Petitioners sought protection of their services; respondents stated services had not been terminated and no threat of termination existed. The court bound the respondents to that statement and permitted withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
Through: Mr.Adv.[appearance not given.]
versus
GOVERNMENT OF NCT DELHI THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PWD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nitika Bhutanj, Panel Counsel for R-1, 3 to 5 with Ms. Neeru Thakran, Labour Officer, Distt Shahadra and North East, Labour Department
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
APRIL 23, 2025/jn
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 28/04/2025 at 15:56:11
Rakesh Kumar & Ors.
Government of NCT Delhi through Principal Secretary PWD
Tara Vitasta Ganju
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
