Disposed¶21

Manihamsa Power Projects Ltd. v. M/S Shree Suryachandra Synergetics India

Delhi HC22 Apr 2025W.P.(C)/5061/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

W.P.(C) 5061/2025; Manihamsa Power Projects Ltd. vs M/S Shree Suryachandra Synergetics India; High Court of Delhi; writ of Mandamus; Debt Recovery Tribunal New Delhi; Transfer Appeal No. 1/2022; time-bound disposal; adjournments; withdrawal of writ petition; leave and liberty granted; no observations on merits; DRT early adjudication request; disposed as withdrawn; 22.04.2025.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to withdraw the Writ Petition; the Writ Petition along with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of as withdrawn, with no observations on the merits. ¶21

Manihamsa Power Projects Ltd. Vs M/S Shree Suryachandra Synergetics India — Delhi HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~67

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 5061/2025

¶4

MANIHAMSA POWER PROJECTS LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mandeep Kalra, AOR, Ms. Anushna Satapathy, Ms. Radhika Jalan, Ms. Widaphi Lyngdoh, Mr. Yashas J, Mr. Vaibhav Yadav, Mr. Paras Mohan Sharma and Ms. Shefali Tripathi, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

M/S SHREE SURYACHANDRA SYNERGETICS INDIA .....Respondent Through: None.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

¶9

O R D E R % 22.04.2025

¶10

The Petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following

¶11

reliefs:-

¶12

“I. Issue a writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing the Debt Recovery Tribunal, New Delhi, to hear and dispose off Transfer Appeal No. 1/2022 within a time-bound manner.

¶13

II. Direct the Respondent to refrain from seeking unwarranted adjournments and direct the Tribunal to avoid granting unnecessary adjournments so as to ensure the effective and timely adjudication of the matter;

¶14

III. Grant such further relief as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶15

After some arguments, learned counsel for the Petitioner has sought liberty to withdraw the Petition.

¶16

Leave and liberty as prayed for, is granted.

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:54:41

¶19

It is always open for the Petitioner to request the Debts Recovery Tribunal [“ DRT ”] for an early adjudication of the case which this Court hopes would be considered sympathetically by the DRT and an endeavour would be made to expedite the hearing depending on the board of the DRT.

¶20

It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of this case.

¶21

The Writ Petition along with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of as withdrawn.

¶22

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.

¶23

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.

¶24

APRIL 22, 2025/nd

¶25

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/07/2025 at 23:54:41

Manihamsa Power Projects Ltd. v. M/S Shree Suryachandra Synergetics India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manihamsa Power Projects Ltd. v. M/S Shree Suryachandra Synergetics India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gsr Infocom Pvt. Ltd. Vs Goods and Services Tax Officer Ward 103 Delhi & Ors.

Puran Store through Its Partner Hari Ram Agarwal Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 43 - 1 & Ors.

Mamta Goyal Vs Punjab National Bank & Anr.

Shri Atul Aggarwal Vs Union of India & Ors.

Anand Tyagi Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Mohammed Afzal (Trade Name) Indian Enterprises Vs Sales Tax Officer Class Ii/Avato and Anr.

Carol Infrastructure Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 27, Delhi & Anr.

Dayanand Bainda Vs Income Tax Officer Ward 28 (5), Delhi

Mamta Goyal Vs Punjab National Bank & Anr.

Dilraj Singh Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Manish Kaushik & Anr. Vs Piramal Capital an Housing Finance Limited

Arun Sogani Vs Special Director Directorate of Enforcement New Delhi

Central Electronics Limited Vs M/S Elcomponics Technologies P. Ltd.

Renesola Singapore Pte Ltd. & Ors. Vs Mns Credit Management Group Pvt. Ltd.